Linux Fan Admits Microsoft More Secure

Enterprise Windows IT: NewsFactor Network - Windows Risk Mgmt. - Linux Fan Admits Microsoft More Secure

In an academic study due to be released next month Dr. Richard Ford -- from the Florida Institute of Technology -- and Dr. Herbert Thompson -- from application security firm Security Innovation -- analyzed vulnerabilities and patching and were forced to conclude that Windows Server 2003 is more secure than Red Hat Linux .

"Vulnerability counts are much higher with Red Hat than with Microsoft," said Dr Ford. "I am a huge Linux fan, and I have a Linux server in my basement. The first time I saw the statistics I thought someone had mucked about with my database."

The pair examined the number of vulnerabilities reported in both systems and the actual and average time it took to issue patches. In all three cases Windows Server 2003 came out ahead, with an average of 30 "days of risk" between a vulnerability being identified and patched compared to 71 from Red Hat.

But the academics acknowledged that some intangibles, including the relative attractiveness of Windows as a target for hackers, could skew the results. Nevertheless, many attacks these days are aimed at Linux servers rather than Windows systems.